The Best EOR in 2025: Deel vs. Remote

Looking for the best Employer of Record (EOR) in 2025? Here’s the quick answer: Deel excels in compliance and integrations for large enterprises, while Remote offers better pricing and stronger compliance control for startups and scaling companies.

Key Takeaways:

• Deel operates in 150+ countries with flexible payroll options, integrations (e.g., QuickBooks, BambooHR), and extensive global reach.
• Remote covers ~100 countries, focusing on compliance, IP protection, and affordability, with owned entities for direct legal control.
• Pricing: Deel costs $599/month per employee and $49/month per contractor; Remote charges $599/month per employee ($29/month per contractor).

Quick Comparison Table

Who should choose what?

• Pick Deel for complex operations, global reach, and advanced integrations.
• Choose Remote for cost savings, compliance focus, and strong IP protection.

Read on to see how they compare in services, usability, and regional expertise.

Deel vs Remote - Comparing Across 7 Key Factors

Deel and Remote: Company Background

The global employment landscape has changed dramatically, with Deel and Remote leading the way in the Employer of Record (EOR) industry. These platforms have reshaped how businesses handle international hiring and workforce management.

While both companies aim to streamline global employment, their strategies differ in key ways.

Deel: Features and Market Position

Deel operates using a mix of its own entities and partner networks, offering integrations with enterprise systems like Netsuite and QuickBooks ^[1]. These integrations cater specifically to enterprise needs, making Deel a practical choice for larger organizations.

This structure helps Deel balance enterprise requirements with the flexibility needed for global operations.

Remote: Features and Market Position

Remote takes a different path, focusing on direct control through its owned entities in fewer countries compared to Deel. This approach allows for full operational oversight ^[2].

Remote stands out with its all-in-one HR management suite, which emphasizes three main features:

• Automated compliance workflows
• Strong intellectual property (IP) protection
• Built-in tools for team management ^[1]

The platform also offers expanding integration options with top HR and recruitment systems ^[1]. This ownership-driven model ensures clear compliance processes for growing teams.

Comparison of Core EOR Services

Deel and Remote both provide solutions tailored to the challenges of global employment, but their methods highlight different priorities and approaches.

Deel uses a hybrid entity model, offering its EOR services across 150+ countries. Their platform is designed for businesses with complex payroll needs, supporting multi-currency payroll automation, tax calculations, and benefits management through a network of integrated partners. This makes Deel particularly effective for handling diverse payroll requirements.

Remote, on the other hand, employs an owned-entity model in 100 countries. This approach emphasizes direct control over compliance and ensures adherence to labor laws. Remote focuses on mandatory benefits compliance, maintaining strict oversight of employment processes to minimize risks.

Both platforms have invested in automating compliance workflows, but their strategies differ. Deel's hybrid model allows for quicker entry into new markets, while Remote's owned-entity structure prioritizes consistent processes and risk management.

Here’s a side-by-side breakdown of their key services:

EOR Services Comparison Table

Global and Regional Coverage

Deel and Remote take different paths when it comes to their global reach, leveraging their unique structures to serve various regions.

Deel's Coverage

Deel operates in over 150 countries, with notable strengths in several key regions:

• Emerging Markets: Strong presence in developing areas.
• Europe: Covers both EU and non-EU nations, ensuring GDPR compliance and adherence to local labor laws.
• Asia-Pacific: Focuses on major tech hubs like Singapore, Japan, and Australia.

Here’s a snapshot of Deel’s regional coverage:

Remote's Coverage

Remote uses an owned-entity model to operate in its serviced countries. Key aspects of their approach include:

• Direct Entity Control: Full ownership of operations in each country.
• Regional Expertise: A strong focus on compliance and local regulations.

Their strategy prioritizes precision and compliance, as seen in their regional focus:

These tailored regional strategies play a crucial role in their compliance capabilities, as highlighted in the Core Services section.

sbb-itb-88a7fe6

Pricing and Cost Analysis

Pricing structures often reveal a company's strategic focus, and this is evident when comparing the models of Deel and Remote. Their pricing aligns with their operational setups - whether hybrid or fully owned entities - highlighting different levels of risk and control.

Remote’s ownership of entities offers more consistent and predictable pricing, as seen with their annual billing discounts. On the other hand, Deel provides bundled service incentives, which can be appealing for businesses seeking flexibility.

When choosing a platform, companies need to weigh these pricing models against their growth plans, while also factoring in compliance and coverage needs discussed earlier. These pricing choices directly influence usability, which will be explored through user feedback in the next section.

Platform Usability and User Experience

Deel and Remote approach user experience differently, reflecting their distinct operational models.

Deel integrates well with existing HR tech setups, making it a good fit for companies that already have systems in place. It connects effortlessly with major tools like Netsuite, BambooHR, Quickbooks, Greenhouse, and Lever ^[1]. This allows businesses to automate workflows across their current platforms.

Remote, on the other hand, focuses on simplicity and compliance. While its integration options are fewer for now, they are expanding. Planned integrations include Rippling and BambooHR ^[1]. This measured approach highlights Remote's priority on compliance, offering fewer customization options but ensuring strong alignment with regulatory needs.

User Feedback Comparison

These ratings emphasize their core strengths: Deel excels in integration and customization, while Remote stands out for its compliance-focused consistency.

Deel's platform offers advanced features and is ideal for businesses managing complex, multi-country HR operations. However, its flexibility may require more onboarding time.

Remote provides a more straightforward, controlled environment, making it a great choice for organizations that prioritize compliance and operational consistency, even if it means sacrificing some flexibility compared to Deel.

Additional Features and Integrations

Deel and Remote offer more than just EOR services - they include extra tools to help businesses manage global teams more effectively. Let’s break down their standout features and how they support international workforce management.

Deel focuses on simplifying global operations with a range of tools. Their global equipment service makes distributing hardware to international teams hassle-free. They also offer a centralized document management system that organizes all employment-related paperwork. On top of that, Deel automates tax compliance by generating key forms like W-9s and W-8BENs, reducing the time and effort spent on administrative tasks.

Remote, on the other hand, leans into HR and benefits management. They provide modules for tracking time off, managing vacations, and handling recruitment. With their owned legal entities, Remote ensures stronger compliance oversight. However, they don’t offer as many integrations as Deel.

Here’s a closer look at their additional features:

These features make a real difference for businesses. For example, Bec Donnelly, Vice President of People at SiteMinder, shared:

"Transitioning to Deel has saved us approx two to three days per month in administration time and costs. We used to have multiple people across the globe trying to coordinate and diagnose issues or run manual processes" ^[1].

When it comes to integrations, Deel leads with connections to top ERP, HRIS, and accounting platforms. Remote is catching up, but their focus remains on compliance. Both platforms prioritize IP protection - Deel uses automated IP clauses, while Remote leverages their owned legal entities.

These added tools and integrations showcase the unique advantages of each platform, helping businesses decide which aligns best with their goals.

Use Cases and Best Fit Scenarios

Here's a closer look at when each platform shines for managing global teams.

Choosing Deel

• For Large Enterprises with Complex Payment Needs: Deel’s payment system supports over 150 currencies across numerous countries, making it a great option for companies expanding globally - especially into less-established markets.
• For Integration-Heavy Workflows: If your organization relies heavily on enterprise software, Deel’s integration capabilities can streamline processes by connecting seamlessly with your existing tools.
• For Managing Contractors: Deel’s contractor management tools are particularly useful for businesses overseeing large international pools of contractors.

Choosing Remote

• For Compliance-Focused Companies: Remote’s network of legal entities ensures compliance with international labor laws, making it ideal for businesses in regulated sectors or those that need extra assurance around legal requirements.
• For Budget-Conscious Startups: Remote’s competitive pricing, especially with annual billing, appeals to startups looking to manage costs while still accessing contractor and EOR services.
• For IP Protection: Companies concerned about intellectual property will appreciate Remote’s direct control over its entities, which strengthens IP security.

Both platforms have high user ratings - Deel scores 4.8/5, while Remote scores 4.6/5 on G2 ^[2]. Deel is particularly strong in global scalability and integrations, while Remote stands out for its focus on compliance and affordability. Your choice will ultimately depend on your organization’s unique needs and priorities.

Conclusion and Recommendations

Deel and Remote each bring distinct strengths to the table, so the best choice depends on your organization's specific needs for managing a global team.

Final Comparison Summary

These differences show how each platform caters to different business priorities.

Deel stands out with its extensive global reach and integrations, making it a strong choice for enterprises operating in diverse markets. Its presence in over 150 countries and compatibility with platforms like NetSuite and BambooHR streamline complex operations.

On the other hand, Remote's owned entities and attractive contractor pricing appeal to startups and industries requiring strict compliance. Its clear pricing structure, paired with discounts for annual billing, makes it a budget-friendly option for smaller organizations.

Key factors to consider:

• Geographical Reach: Deel offers better coverage in less common markets.
• Budget: Remote provides lower contractor rates and discounts for annual plans.
• Compliance: Remote's ownership of local entities ensures direct control.
• Integrations: Deel supports a broader range of tools for seamless operations.

Related Blog Posts

• Top Tech Recruitment Firms for Remote Talent in 2025
• US-Based Remote Staffing Agency Connecting You to Top Global Talent
• 12 Best Remote Recruitment Agencies to Hire Global Talent
• Top 6 Employer of Record Companies in 2025